USPTO serial 76113847
COATINGSDIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3485376Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 12, 2008
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COATINGSDIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
READING, PA
READING, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua A. Lorentz
Joshua A. Lorentz DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP1900 CHEMED CENTER255 E 5TH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4700Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | interior and exterior consumer house paints; specialty consumers paints, namely, floor enamels; wood stains, water-based industrial paints and coatings, namely, paints for metal; paints for use in the manufacture for doors, window frames, moldings, wood components; sealer coatings for door skins, wood and wood composite panels | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 17, 2008 |
| 017 | acrylic-based driveway, concrete, and paving stone sealants; driveway, concrete, and paving stone sealants composed primarily of acrylic | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 17, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CFS Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CFS Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by IFS INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IFS INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named COATINGSDIRECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |