USPTO serial 76113931
CBPI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CBPI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith A. Barritt
KEITH A BARRITT FISH & RICHARDSON601 13TH ST NW STE 901 SWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3824UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | nonmetal building products and materials, namely, decking, railings, joists and boards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |