USPTO serial 76114179
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D-80335 Munchen, DE
D-80335 Munchen, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E Apolzon
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer and computer peripherals; magnetic and optical program and data carriers, namely, blank computer discs, blank CD-ROMS, DVDs and tapes for software, electronic data processing software to be worked with on a multitude of mobile devices independent of platforms and databases, for data management and storage, data connectivity, data administration, user and device administration, comfortable visualizing, data consistency, failure and conflict management, and data transfer security for mobile applications; and instructional manuals sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed instructional, educational, and teaching materials for computer programs in the field of data processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | consultation and analysis in the field of organizing business procedures with respect to data processing law; analysis of business procedures for electronic data processing; licensing of computer software in the field of data processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | maintenance of computer hardware; installation of computer networks; installation of computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | computer education training services for computer hardware and software; publishing of computer software; publication of printed teaching materials in the field of electronic data processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | planning of data processing hardware and software systems; maintenance of computer software; computer programming for others; technical writing for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems via telephone, fax and in person; leasing of computer software in the field of data processing; leasing of computers; consultation regarding the maintenance of data processing systems; consultation regarding data processing hardware and software system | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |