USPTO serial 76114229
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Other trademarks owned by Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
Melbourne, Victoria,, AU
Other trademarks owned by Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | [EXPLOSIVES, BULK AND PACKAGED EXPLOSIVES;] EXPLOSIVES COMPOSITIONS FOR USE BY USERS OF EXPLOSIVES IN THE MINING, CONSTRUCTION, EXCAVATION INDUSTRIES; ELECTRIC [AND NON-ELECTRIC] EXPLOSIVE INITIATORS, NAMELY DEVICES USED TO DETONATE EXPLOSIVES; DETONATORS; EXPLOSIVES ACCESSORIES NAMELY ELECTRIC AND NON-ELECTRIC SHOCKWAVE CONDUCTORS, PLASTIC OR METALLIC SHOCK TUBING, TRANSMITTER CAPS, CONNECTING BLOCKS, PRIMERS, BOOSTERS, AND ELECTRIC [ AND NON-ELECTRIC] FUSES | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 26, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 2, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |