USPTO serial 76114230
I-KON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2004
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with I-KON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Other trademarks owned by Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Other trademarks owned by Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, AU
Other trademarks owned by Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MEASURING, SIGNALLING, CHECKING AND DATA RECORDING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, DEVICES FOR TESTING ELECTRONIC DETONATORS AND THEIR COMPONENTS, DEVICES FOR LOGGING THE ENCODED IDENTIFICATION OF ELECTRONIC DETONATORS AND THEIR COMPONENTS, DEVICES FOR LOGGING THE POSITION OF ELECTRONIC DETONATORS AND THEIR COMPONENTS, DEVICES FOR TRANSMITTING AND INITIATING A FIRING SEQUENCE IN ELECTRONIC DETONATORS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY COMPUTER OPERATING SOFTWARE FOR THE USE AND OPERATION OF TESTING, LOGGING, CONNECTING, TRANSMITTING AND INITIATING DEVICES USED IN PROGRAMMING BLASTS AND EXPLOSIONS; DATA MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE, NAMELY SOFTWARE USED FOR RECORDING DATA IN CONNECTION WITH COMPLETED BLASTS AND EXPLOSIONS; ALL AFOREMENTIONED GOODS FOR USE BY USERS OF EXPLOSIVES, AND IN THE MINING, CONSTRUCTION, AND EXCAVATION INDUSTRIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | [ EXPLOSIVES, BULK AND PACKAGED EXPLOSIVES; ] EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITIONS FOR USE BY USERS OF EXPLOSIVES IN THE MINING, CONSTRUCTION, AND EXCAVATION INDUSTRIES; ELECTRIC [ AND NON-ELECTRIC ] EXPLOSIVE INITIATORS, namely, DEVICES USED TO DETONATE EXPLOSIVES; DETONATORS; EXPLOSIVE ACCESSORIES, [ namely, ELECTRIC AND NON-ELECTRIC SHOCKWAVE CONDUCTORS, PLASTIC OR METALLIC SHOCK TUBING, TRANSMITTER CAPS, CONNECTING BLOCKS, PRIMERS, BOOSTERS, AND ELECTRIC AND NON-ELECTRIC FUSES ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | [ BLASTING MANAGEMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND REPAIR SERVICES FOR USERS OF EXPLOSIVES AND IN THE MINING, CONSTRUCTION, AND EXCAVATION INDUSTRIES; EXPLOSIVES BLASTING, NAMELY, BLAST HOLE DRILLING, BLAST HOLE LOADING, INITIATION OF BLASTS AND ASSESSMENT OF BLASTS; BLAST PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND RISK ANALYSIS ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ CONSULTING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES TO USERS OF EXPLOSIVES AND IN THE MINING, CONSTRUCTION, AND EXCAVATION INDUSTRIES; DESIGN OF BLAST SITES; COMPUTER DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE OF SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF EXPLOSIVES, SUPPLYING EXPLOSIVES AND EXPLOSIVE ACCESSORIES; EXPLOSIVES DESIGN ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named I-KON
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 22, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 21, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 24, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 24, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |