USPTO serial 76114368
QUANTUM DECISION MAKING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUANTUM DECISION MAKING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William Lawrence Chapin
16791 SEA WITCH LNHUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES,NAMELY, CONDUCTING WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELDS OF THE PSYCHOLOGY OF HUMAN ORGANIZATIONS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING EDUCATIONAL WORKSHOPS AND DIDACTIC SEMINARS IN THE USE OF EFFECTIVE DECISION MAKING; EXECUTIVE TRAINING AND COACHING OF HIGH LEVEL EXECUTIVES OF R=ORGANIZATIONS AND COMPANIES IN METHODS AND TECHNIQUES FOR CREATING HIGHER LEVELS OF PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONS AND CORPORATIONS, BY LEARNING TO USE ONE'S INTUITION IN DECISION MAKING IN ADDITION TO HIS AND HER INTELLECTUAL AND EMOTIONAL RESOURCES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF CREATIVE STRATEGIES TO GAIN GREATER CLARITY IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES RELATED TO THE ORGANIZATION OR COMPANY, AND THEREBY TO MOVE EFFECTIVELY SOLVE PROBLEMS WHICH CONFRONT THE ORGANIZATION OR COMPANY | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |