USPTO serial 76114779
LA CARRERA NEVADA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 4, 2003
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LA CARRERA NEVADA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Amici Americani Della Mille Miglia
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Amici Americani Della Mille Miglia
Amici Americani Della Mille Miglia
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Amici Americani Della Mille Miglia
Amici Americani Della Mille Miglia
San Rafael, CA
Other trademarks owned by Amici Americani Della Mille Miglia
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Saideh Dadras
Saideh Dadras Finck & Dadras LLPSuite 700100 Spear StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services in the nature of arranging and conducting motoring tour style races | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Amici Americani Della Mille Miglia
- Other trademarks owned by Amici Americani Della Mille Miglia
- Other trademarks owned by Amici Americani Della Mille Miglia
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named LA CARRERA NEVADA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |