USPTO serial 76114983
HARVEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROMAGHIM, PETER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HARVEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Qingdao Baofeng Co. (USA), LTD.
Plainview, NY
Qingdao Baofeng Co. (USA), LTD.
Plainview, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
BROOKLYN, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | SEAFOOD, NAMELY, SCALLOP, CLAM MEAT, JELLY FISH, AND SMALL SHRIMP; FROZEN BROAD BEAN; AND DRIED PERSIMMON | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Qingdao Baofeng Co. (USA), LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Qingdao Baofeng Co. (USA), LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by AMEASIA CO., LTD
- Other trademarks owned by AMEASIA CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named HARVEST
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |