USPTO serial 76115246
REVIFACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REVIFACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rotterdam, NL
INTERPAT INTERNATIONAL PATENTS AND TRADING LIMITED COMPANY
BUDAPEST, HU
Other trademarks owned by INTERPAT INTERNATIONAL PATENTS AND TRADING LIMITED COMPANY
INTERPAT INTERNATIONAL PATENTS AND TRADING LIMITED COMPANY
BUDAPEST, HU
Other trademarks owned by INTERPAT INTERNATIONAL PATENTS AND TRADING LIMITED COMPANY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Franklin Rothwell
G FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC1425 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ceteris Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by INTERPAT INTERNATIONAL PATENTS AND TRADING LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by INTERPAT INTERNATIONAL PATENTS AND TRADING LIMITED COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named REVIFACE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 16, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |