Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76115439?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76115439. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns REDCHIP REVIEW?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76115439, the listed owner(s) include: REDCHIP COMPANIES, L.L.C., Redchip.com, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 76115439?

Serial number 76115439 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark REDCHIP REVIEW. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of REDCHIP REVIEW?

REDCHIP REVIEW (76115439) currently shows USPTO status code 601 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover REDCHIP REVIEW?

The public record lists International Classes: 016. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

Trademark: REDCHIP REVIEW Serial# 76115439 | status 601; last event ABN1 | Trademark Info & Attorney Guidance

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REDCHIP REVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

REDCHIP COMPANIES, L.L.C.
SPOKANE, WA
Other trademarks owned by REDCHIP COMPANIES, L.L.C.
Redchip.com, Inc.
spokane, WA
Other trademarks owned by Redchip.com, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANNABELLE DANIELVARDA

ANNABELLE DANIELVARDA WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE ML RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
016	Printed publications, namely, magazines, newsletters, newspapers, journals, and research reports, all featuring financial information, news, commentary, and analysis	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 28, 2004	ABN1	ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED	—
Mar 30, 2004	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 30, 2004	FAXX	FAX RECEIVED	—
Mar 2, 2004	CFIT	CASE FILE IN TICRS	—
Aug 26, 2003	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jun 22, 2003	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Jun 2, 2003	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Apr 7, 2003	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 7, 2003	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 7, 2003	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Aug 27, 2002	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 27, 2002	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
May 23, 2002	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 5, 2001	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 4, 2001	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2000	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—

REDCHIP REVIEW