USPTO serial 76115626
DRIVING TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRIVING TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eliane Setton
ELIANE SETTON GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLPP O BOX 77630SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94107-0630UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Electronic transmission of data, images and documents via computer terminals and networks regarding the automotive industry, motor vehicles and motor vehicles' sales, leasing, prices and ratings; audio-broadcasting, TV-broadcasting, cable television broadcasting, television broadcasting, cable broadcasting and delivery of audio, video and multimedia content by means of TV, cellular and wireless communications devices, television, cable television, closed circuit television, and global computer networks regarding the automotive industry, motor vehicles and sales, leasing, prices and ratings of motor vehicles; providing online electronic billboards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning the automotive industry, motor vehicles and sales, leasing, prices and ratings of motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |