USPTO serial 76115657
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Great Valley, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ruth Mae Finch
RUTH MAE FINCH STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER, LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO ARCHIVE AND RETRIEVE ELECTRONIC COMPUTER DATA AND DOCUMENTS STORED ON LOCAL DISK DRIVES | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1999 |
| 016 | User documentation and manuals, system administrator documentation manuals, in the field of data and document archiving for business, and training materials namely, end-user training, system administration training, consulting training, technical software engineering training and sales training materials in connection with computer software in the field of data and document archiving for business; pamphlets and manuals | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1999 |
| 035 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1999 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING E.G. CLASSES, SEMINARS FOR END-USER, SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION, AND TECHNICAL SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF E.G. DATA ARCHIVING, IMAGING, AND BUSINESS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT AND SALES TRAINING MATERIAL IN CONNECTION THEREWITH | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |