Drawing for E-JET

USPTO serial 76115692

E-JET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPKINS, TRICIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-JET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas I. Rozsa

LOUIS BOVASSO GREENBERG TRAURIG2450 COLORADO AVE STE 400ESANTA MONICA, CA 90404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRIC POWER BLOWERS FOR LAWN DEBRIS, INCLUDING A PROFESSIONAL GRADE WITH A LEAD ACID BATTERY, A PROFESSIONAL GRADE WITH A NICKEL METAL HYDRIDE BATTERY, AND AN ELECTRIC CONSUMER MODELACTIVE—
009LEAD ACID BATTERY PACKS AND NICKEL METAL HYDRIDE BATTERY PACKS FOR USE WITH POWER BLOWERS FOR LAWN DEBRISACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 16, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 30, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 30, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 22, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 12, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance