USPTO serial 76115706
NUTRIPACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 13, 2004
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRIPACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SIMPLOT TURF AND HORTICULTRE, A DIVISION OF J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
BOISE, ID
Other trademarks owned by SIMPLOT TURF AND HORTICULTRE, A DIVISION OF J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
BOISE, ID
BOISE, ID
BOISE, ID
San Diego, CA
SIMPLOT TURF AND HORTICULTURE, A DIVISION OF J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
BOISE, ID
Other trademarks owned by SIMPLOT TURF AND HORTICULTURE, A DIVISION OF J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander H. Butterman, Esq.
J R SIMPLOT COMPANYPO BOX 27BOISE, ID 83707UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Soil conditioners for agricultural use | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SIMPLOT TURF AND HORTICULTRE, A DIVISION OF J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by ECO SOIL SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SIMPLOT TURF AND HORTICULTURE, A DIVISION OF J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named NUTRIPACK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2006 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |