Drawing for CADENCE MEDIA GROUP

USPTO serial 76115714

CADENCE MEDIA GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CADENCE MEDIA GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory K. Nelson

WADE R BUDGE SNELL & WILMER LLP15 W S TEMPLE, STE 1200SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Graphic art design; multimedia and graphic art design and development services, namely, designing and developing websites, e-commerce business, closed-computer networks, extranets, and on-line stores for othersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 26, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 16, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 16, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 7, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 22, 2002OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 2, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance