USPTO serial 76115721
HYPERCHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYPERCHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua
MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR LLP60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY, SWITCHES, LINE CARDS, COMPUTER SERVERS, COMPUTER CHIPS, SUPERCOMPUTERS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, SEMICONDUCTORS, REGISTERS AND MEMORIES; NETWORKING, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, CONNECTIVITY, ROUTING, FIBER OPTIC TRANSPORT AND NETWORK ACCESS EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, TRAFFIC MANAGERS, SERVERS, ROUTERS, HUBS, SWITCHES, OPTICAL AMPLIFIERS AND SWITCHES, WIRELESS SWITCHES, BASE STATIONS, GATEWAYS, BRIDGES, BROUTERS, CONCENTRATORS, AGGREGATORS, MODEMS, NETWORK INTERFACE CARDS, LINE CARDS, SWITCH ROUTERS, ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT RACKS, SHELVES FOR ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT RACKS, HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE MODULES, BACKPLANES, AUTOMATIC CALL DISTRIBUTORS; AND COMPUTER PROGRAMS RELATING TO THE FOREGOING, NAMELY, COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR NETWORKING COMPUTERS, FOR NETWORK TRAFFIC ENGINEERING, AND FOR ACCESSING, CONTROLLING, MONITORING AND MANAGING GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, LOCAL AREA NETWORKS, WIDE AREA NETWORKS, METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS AND STORAGE AREA NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | CONNECTIVITY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ACCESS TO GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS, LOCAL AREA NETWORKS, WIDE AREA NETWORKS, METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS AND STORAGE AREA NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER NETWORKING, ROUTING AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING CONTROL OF, MONITORING OF, MANAGEMENT OF, AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING OF GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS, LOCAL AREA NETWORKS, WIDE AREA NETWORKS, METROPOLITAN AREA NETWORKS AND STORAGE AREA NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HYPERCHIP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HYPERCHIP INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HYPERCHIP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |