USPTO serial 76115733
ONE CLICK RX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE CLICK RX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL D FISHMAN
MICHAEL D FISHMAN RADER FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC39533 WOODWARD AVE STE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN FACILITATING AND COORDINATING THE ISSUANCE OF PRESCRIPTIONS, DISPENSING MEDICATIONS, PAYING FOR PRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS, ADMINISTERING PRESCRIPTION PLANS, VERIFYING PRESCRIPTION BILLS AND COORDINATING PRESCRIPTIONS, FOR USE BY PHYSICIANS, PHARMACIES AND THIRD PARTY PAYORS AND MANUALS PROVIDED THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF PRESCRIPTIONS FROM HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS' OFFICES TO PHARMACIES AND TO THIRD PARTY PAYORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING ON-LINE NETWORK SERVICES TO HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS, PHARMACIES AND THIRD PARTY PAYORS FOR FACILITATING COMMUNICATION AND INTERACTION BETWEEN HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS, PHARMACIES AND THIRD PARTY PAYORS REGARDING PRESCRIPTION AND PRESCRIBED MEDICATIONS, FOR FACILITATING AND COORDINATING THE ISSUANCE OF PRESCRIPTIONS, DISPENSING OF PRESCRIPTION MEDICATIONS AND PAYMENT OF PRESCRIPTION BILLS, AND THE ADMINISTRATION, VERIFICATION AND MANAGEMENT THEREOF; PROVIDING COMPUTERIZED INFORMATION AND AN INTERACTIVE DATABASE TO HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS, PHARMACIES AND THIRD PARTY PAYORS, FEATURING INFORMATION RELATING TO PROCESSING OF NEW PRESCRIPTIONS, PRESCRIPTION REFILLS, PRESCRIPTION DRUG INFORMATION, DRUG HISTORY AND HEALTHCARE BACKGROUND INFORMATION, AND MAINTAINING A DATABASE RELATING TO SUCH DRUG AND HEALTHCARE INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by E-ZScrips.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by E-ZScrips.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ONE CLICK RX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |