USPTO serial 76115774
DRIVIN.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRIVIN.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eliane Setton
ELIANE SETTON GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLPP O BOX 77630PALO ALTO, CA 94107-0630UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing electronic bulletin boards and messages regarding the automotive industry, motor vehicles and motor vehicles' sales, leasing, prices and ratings; design, creating, hosting, maintenance, consulting and technical assistance services in the fields of designing, creating, hosting, maintaining, operating, managing, advertising and marketing of online commerce websites relating to the automotive industry, motor vehicles and motor vehicles' sales, leasing, prices and ratings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |