USPTO serial 76115968
Serial No. 76115968
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 76115968?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Val J Christensen
VAL J CHRISTENSEN FRANKLIN COVEY CO2200 W PKWY BLVD MS 0750SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, BOOKS, MANUALS, GUIDE BOOKS, PERIODICALS, POSTERS, TRANSPARENCIES AND PAMPHLETS, ALL CONCERNING BUSINESS LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, COMMUNICATIONS, EFFECTIVENESS AND ASSESSMENT; TIME PLANNERS AND TIME ORGANIZERS FOR PORTABLE OR DESKTOP USE, PRINTED TIME PLANNING SHEETS, CALENDARS, BOOKMARKS, NON-LEATHER NOTEBOOKS, NON-LEATHER STORAGE BINDERS AND CARDBOARD STORAGE BOXES FOR TIME PLANNING RECORDS | ACTIVE | Oct 8, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |