USPTO serial 76116341
TIERFLEET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2957410Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2005
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TIERFLEET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HOMAYOUN YOUSEFI' ZADEH
HOMAYOUN YOUSEFI ZADEH TIERFLEET INC16 VIENNEIRVINE, CA 92606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Thin application servers comprised of computer hardware and software for the operation thereof, special-purpose computers, server computers, load-balancing database computer hardware and software, special purpose computers for scalable database management applications, all in the field of multi-tier computing and data processing; Computer systems, namely, turn-key computers comprising computer hardware and operating software; Computer hardware, namely, micro-controllers, integrated circuits, computer processors, central processing units, computer motherboards, computer memories, network interfaces, network interface cards, host bus adapter cards, computer hard disk drives, computer compact disk drives, computer floppy disk drives, storage towers, and redundant array of independent disks (RAID); Thin application servers comprised of computer hardware and software for the operation thereof and special purpose computers for storing, retrieving and managing data for database management systems; Thin application servers comprising computer hardware, operating system software and computer programs, for database management, for storing, retrieving and managing data, for managing databases stored on server appliances, for conducting electronic transactions, namely, sending and receiving electronic mail, making financial transactions, ordering goods on-line, providing automated support of computer hardware and software on-line, transmitting media content on-line, storing and retrieving data on-line, for providing high-availability, scalability, and for enhancing the performance of database management systems; Thin application servers comprised of computer hardware and software for the operation thereof for load balancing of database management systems; Thin application servers comprised of computer hardware and software for the operation thereof for storing, retrieving and managing data for database management systems in the fields of business, scientific, technical, commercial, educational and computing; Thin application servers comprised of computer hardware and software for the operation thereof for providing high-availability, scalability, performance, low overhead of setup, management, and maintenance for database management systems independent of the choice of database systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |