USPTO serial 76116500
ELMAG SUPERFICI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2619752Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 17, 2002
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ELMAG SUPERFICI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
20052 Monza, Milan, IT
20052 Monza, Milan, IT
Monza, Milan, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Sunshine
David B. Sunshine Cozen O'Connor175 Greenwich Street, 55th Floor3 World Trade CenterNEW YORK, NY 10007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES THAT COMPRISE AUTOMATIC WOOD FINISHING LINES, NAMELY, HANDLING MACHINES FOR LOADING, UNLOADING, TRANSFERRING AND STACKING WOOD; MACHINES FOR PAINTING AND VARNISHING WOOD PANELS, PLATES, PRINTED CIRCUITS, PAPER AND PLASTIC MATERIALS, NAMELY ROLLER COATING MACHINES FOR APPLYING ALL TYPES OF LACQUERS, CURTAIN COATING MACHINES FOR APPLYING ALL TYPES OF FINISHING MATERIALS WITH LOW AND MEDIUM VISCOSITY, AND SURFACE SPRAYING MACHINES FOR APPLYING STAINS, SEALERS AND TOPCOATS; SANDING MACHINES; AND BRUSHING MACHINES FOR CLEANING SURFACES OF SANDED WOOD, ALL THE AFOREMENTIONED MACHINES FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE AND FINISHING OF WOOD FURNITURE, MOLDINGS FOR FURNITURE AND CABINETRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | DRYING APPARATUS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE AND FINISHING OF WOOD FURNITURE, MOLDINGS FOR FURNITURE AND CABINETRY, NAMELY, INDUSTRIAL LAMPS, JET DRYERS, ULTRA VIOLET CURING RADIATORS, AND INFRARED LIGHTING DRYERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 17, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 29, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |