USPTO serial 76116613
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Starvision Multimedia Corporation
Vancouver, Britizsh Columbia V5C 6C6, CA
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
VANCOUVER, BC, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cory M. Amron
Cory M. Amron Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPP.O. Box 2255IPLaw@VorysColumbus, OH 43216-2255| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, firmware, and software products that enable multimedia services and applications namely switches, servers, multimedia data processors and multimedia microprocessors for use with telecommunications networks for the purpose of conferencing, message storage, and voice recognition; multimedia data processors and multimedia microprocessors implemented with digital signal processors, very large scale integrated circuits, and field programmable gate arrays; software for the operation and control of switches, servers, multimedia data processors and multimedia microprocessors; and instructional documentation sold as a unit with computer software and hardware | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 30, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |