USPTO serial 76116670
FUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3449901Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2008
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, dissemination of advertising materials for others, providing advertising space in a periodical, creating corporate logos for others, direct mail advertising; advertising agencies; advertising services, namely, creating corporate and brand identity for others; cooperative advertising and marketing services; business marketing consulting services; promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic magazine accessed through a global computer network, by providing hypertext links to the web sites of others, by operating an on-line shopping mall with links to the retail web sites of others, by on-line ordering and cataloging of those goods and services, and by the distribution of printed material and promotional contests; retail variety stores; retail consumer technology stores; retail clothing stores; retail convenience stores; supermarkets; automobile dealerships; retail furniture stores; retail toy stores; retail sporting goods stores; retail gasoline supply services; retail gift shops; retail computer stores; retail cosmetic stores; retail jewelry stores; retail consumer appliance stores; retail food and beverage stores; retail apparel stores; retail television stores; business networking; online retail stores featuring technology, automobiles, furniture, toys, tools, appliances, jewelry, crafts, music, and movies; independent sales representatives in the fields of technology, automobiles, food, beverages, toys, music, clothing, aircraft, boats, and tools | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2010 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 4, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 10, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 27, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 17, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |