Drawing for IPOW

USPTO serial 76116719

IPOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IPOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carla B. Oakley

CARLA B OAKLEY BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunications equipment, namely, telephone, broadband, wireless, Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), Internet Protocol (IP) packet switching exchanges, PBX, and key telephone packet switching exchanges; computer hardware, namely, network servers, computer terminals, processors and computer interface boards, pagers, broadband data and video apparatus for teleconferencing; microwave and local multipoint distribution devices that permit the high-speed transmission of simultaneous two-way voice, data and multi-channel video; telecommunications signal routers, electronic switches, hubs, radio transmitters and receivers, microwave and millimeter wave transmitters and receivers, optical transmitters and receivers, transceivers, encoders, decoders, multiplexers, modulators, demodulators, modems, converters, frequency shifters, signal repeaters, signal processors, and antennae; power supplies and battery chargers; telephone sets; electronic alarms for use with transmission devices to signal malfunctions, overloads, or damage; microphones; electronic signal filters; and computer programs for operating telecommunications and data communications systemsACTIVE—
037Installation and maintenance of wireless broadband network equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 25, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 25, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 22, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance