USPTO serial 76117296
MASKED MAN VINEYARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASKED MAN VINEYARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calistoga, CA
Calistoga, CA
Calistoga, CA
Calistoga, CA
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Goldin, Ron
- Other trademarks owned by Goldin, Ron
- Other trademarks owned by Young, Mark
- Other trademarks owned by Young, Mark
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MASKED MAN VINEYARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 5, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |