USPTO serial 76117336
BRAIN GAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAIN GAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Beck
MICHAEL D BECK BAKER & DANIELS300 N MERIDIAN ST STE 2700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT OF COLLEGE INTERNSHIP AND CO-OPERATIVE EDUCATION PROGRAMS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | promotion of educational services, namely, promoting the use of internship and co-operative education programs by students and employers; promotion of educational programs which develop skills in the application of academic education and interdisciplinary learning and provide work experience; educational services, namely, providing information to students, employers and educational institutions regarding internships and co-operative programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by "Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, Inc."
- Other trademarks owned by "Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, Inc."
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRAIN GAIN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |