USPTO serial 76117515
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
1043 EX Amsterdam, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES PCTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in the search, retrieval, filtering,managing, profiling, clustering, and expert finding of information in the field of database management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | purchasing agent services in the field of information technology; business consultation; computerized database management for websites | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, designing, developing,and updating of computer software for Internet and network applications for others; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable search retrievable and filtering software for information and database management purposes; consultancy cornering the use of computer software; technical cosultancy concerning the Internet; computer programming for the exploitation of virtual markets on the Internet for others; automation services, namely, installation and implementation of computer software; computer services, namely, developing and updating databases for others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |