USPTO serial 76117674
NORM'S WILD BERRY MOONSHINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NORM'S WILD BERRY MOONSHINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 2K3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce A. Tassan
BRUCE A TASSAN4143 N 27TH STARLINGTON, VA 22207UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Prepared alcohol fruit-flavored cocktails | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |