USPTO serial 76117720
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arlene D. Hanks
ARLENE D HANKS MOORE & VAN ALLEN, PLLC2200 W MAIN STSTE 800DURHAM, NC 27705| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, promoting amateur sporting events and tournaments and sports facilities through the distribution of printed materials and electronic advertisements for others; leasing and purchasing sports equipment | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Provision of information to the public regarding amateur sports and amateur sports teams, organizations, events, societies, activities, camps, tournaments, games, leagues, schools, festivals and programs; and providing facilities and venues for engaging in amateur sports, namely, hockey, lacrosse, baseball, soccer, softball, running, golf, skating, triathlons, marathons, swimming, basketball, soccer, softball, running, golf, skating, triathlons, marathons, swimming, basketball, football, rugby, dance, cricket, cycling, and flag football | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |