USPTO serial 76117757
LANDER NATURALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LANDER NATURALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HARRIET E. PERKINS
TODD A DENYS MATHEWS, COLLINS, SHEPHERD & MCKAY, PA100 THANET CIR STE 306PRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath and body products, namely, bubble bath, body wash, shower gel, bath gel, foam bath, body glitter, body powder; foot care products, namely, non-medicated foot lotion, non-medicated foot powder; skin care products, namely, hand lotion, body lotion, skin lotion, skin cream, non-medicated lip balm; hair care products, namely, hair shampoo, hair conditioners, hair spritz, hair gel, hair glitter; personal care products, namely, antiperspirant; deodorant, cologne, scented body spray | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 18, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |