USPTO serial 76117903
SOAKED IN GIGGLES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2767273Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2003
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOAKED IN GIGGLES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Long Island City, NY
Long Island City, NY
Temecula, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand
Steven R. Gursky, Mary L. Grieco, Safia A. Anand Olshan Grundman Frome Rosenzweig & Wolosky LLP65 East 55th StreetNew York, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY BATH GELS, BATH OILS, BATH POWDERS, BATH SALTS, BODY SPRAYS, BODY SPLASHES, BUBBLE BATH, HAIR CONDITIONERS AND HAIR SHAMPOOS, AND SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, NAMELY SKIN CLEANSERS, SKIN CLEANING BARS, SKIN TONERS, SKIN MOISTURIZERS, EYE GEL, MAKEUP REMOVER, NON-MEDICATED BLEMISH TREATMENT CREAMS, FADE CREAMS, FADE GELS, FACIAL MASKS AND FACIAL SCRUBS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |