USPTO serial 76117922
UNCLE FRED'S SAUSAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNCLE FRED'S SAUSAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles N. Quinn
ZANE HULLIHEN 1344 SKYLINE DR PO BOX 35BLANDBURG, PA 16619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Sausage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hullihen, Zane
- Other trademarks owned by Hullihen, Zane
- Other trademarks owned by UNCLE FRED'S SAUSAGE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named UNCLE FRED'S SAUSAGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |