USPTO serial 76118119
HOME STATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOME STATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
20010 PREGNANA MILANESE (Milan), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DIANA MICHELLE SOBO
DIANA MICHELLE SOBO BROWDY AND NEIMARK624 NINTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR THE PURPOSES OF ALLOWING USERS TO WEB BROWSE, EXCHANGE ELECTRONIC MAIL, PERFORM ELECTRONIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK,PARTICIPATE IN LIVE TYPED AND VIDEO CORRESPONDENCE VIA ONLINE CHAT ROOMS, PARTICIPATE IN VIDEO CONFERENCING,DOWNLOAD COMPUTER SYSTEM UPGRADES AND UPDATES, RECEIVE VIDEO TRANSMISSIONS ON DEMAND, AND VIEW ELECTRONIC PROGRAM GUIDES; PERSONAL VIDEO RECORDERS FOR RECORDING AUDIO AND VIDEO IMAGES WITH REMOTE PROGRAMMING, WEB SERVER, AND TIME SHIFT CAPABILITIES; DIGITAL VIDEO RECEIVERS; DVD MACHINES FOR WRITING AND PLAYING DVDS;CD MACHINES FOR WRITING AND PLAYING CDS; DVD ROM DRIVERS AND DVD ROM WRITERS;RADIOS; INTERNET RADIOS;DIGITAL VIDEO CAMERA AND ANALOG VIDEO CAMERA TRIPOD SUPPORT; LOCAL AND REMOTE SECURITY CONTROL AND MONITORING APPARATUS FOR INTRUSION WARNING, CENTRALIZED APPLIANCE CONTROL, GAS DETECTOR WARNING AND CONTROL, WATER LEAKAGE WARNING AND CONTROL, AND TEMPERATURE CONTROL; MODULAR SCALABLE COMMUNICATION GATEWAY SOFTWARE FOR SECURING NETWORK TRAFFIC THROUGH FIRE WALLS AND PROVIDING GATEWAYS BETWEEN WANS AND LANS CONNECTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION GATEWAY SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY PERSONAL COMMUNICATION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |