USPTO serial 76118187
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New Glasgow, Nova Scotia, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy Machaalany
Roy Machaalany Flansberry Menard and Associates208-4275 Innes Rd.Ottawa, Ontario, K1C1T1CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Bird feeders, garden supplies, namely, bird accessories, namely, bird gravel, bird sand, bird cakes, bird treats, bird nests, bird biscuits, bird wash, bird insect powders, gravel paper, bird insect liquids, bird disinfectants, bird cages, all metal and glass articles in general required for the keeping, care and treatment of cage birds, bird bitters; bird vitamins; cage stands, cage covers; bird food and/or water dishes, bird baths, suet; wildlife art; wildlife greeting cards; wildlife books; wildlife videotapes; wildlife cassette tapes; wildlife compact discs; binoculars, scopes, books, sound tapes, videos, bird houses, spotting scopes, field guides, bird and nature related books, periodicals, tapes, CDs, handcrafted country nature theme gifts; bird books and video for bird care tested seed; treated bird seed; bathing-houses, drinking vessels, nesting boxes and baskets, feeding boxes and houses, bells, foodstuff holders; birds additives, supplements and protein preparation for use with such goods; wild bird houses; bird seed dispensers and window netting; birds cage stands and supports; bird food; hand- feeding diet for birds; squab and nectar diets for birds; medicated, maintenance and breeder crumbles or pellets for birds; bird starter kits; bird food supplements; bird seed supplements, edible treats and suet for birds; wild bird food feeding devices; bird bitters, bird wash, bird nesting, bird tonic | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Bird seed | ACTIVE | Aug 18, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |