USPTO serial 76118283
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
VIDAIR Avionics Aktiengesellschaft
41238 Monchengladbach, DE
Other trademarks owned by VIDAIR Avionics Aktiengesellschaft
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W. BECKER
ROBERT W BECKER ROBERT W BECKER & ASSOCIATES11896 N HWY 14 STETIJERAS, NM 87059UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | optical monitoring devices and apparatus and instruments, namely cameras, video-cameras, closed-circuit television cameras, camcorders, monitors, liquid crystal displays, video-projectors, screens; control devices and apparatus and instruments for monitoring and checking people, namely cameras, video-cameras, closed-circuit television cameras, camcorders, monitors, liquid crystal displays, video-projectors, screens, sensors and detectors for checking identity, movement, access and/or authority of people; apparatus for recording, processing, transmission and play back of sound and picture, namely videotape players, videotape-recorders, CD-players, CD-recorders, DVD-players, DVD-recorders, MP3-players, MP3-recorders, loud-speakers, public-address-systems, video-beamers, bus-systems, bus-interfaces, bus-networks, computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Developing EDP-programs, namely computer programs for others, for processing sound and picture signals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |