Drawing for BANANAS GRILLE & BAR

USPTO serial 76118492

BANANAS GRILLE & BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BANANAS GRILLE & BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Golan

STEPHEN L GOLAN FIELD & GOLAN70 W MADISON ST STE 1500CHICAGO, IL 60602-4265UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant services; providing banquet and social function facilities for special occasions; cocktail lounge buffets; cocktail loungesABANDONEDSep 15, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 25, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Apr 14, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 22, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 11, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance