Drawing for GLOBAL LOCATE

USPTO serial 76118576

GLOBAL LOCATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLOBAL LOCATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond R. Moser, Jr.

RAYMOND R MOSER JR MOSER IP LAW GROUP1040 BROAD ST 2ND FLSHREWSBURY, NJ 07702UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Identifying the geographic position of persons or objects using satellite positioning systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 26, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 14, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 25, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 31, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 9, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 22, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 4, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance