USPTO serial 76118673
WAVE SECURITIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2955233Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2005
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WAVE SECURITIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
CHICAGO, IL
CHICAGO, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
CHARLOTTE, NC
MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
CHARLOTTE, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Vogel
Jason M. Vogel Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP31 West 52nd Street, 14th FloorNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Newsletters, brochures, and pamphlets, leaflets and flyers in the fields of securities, options, bonds and other financial instruments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 036 | Broker-dealer services in the fields of securities, options, bonds, and other financial instruments; research services for others in the field of securities, options, bonds, and other financial instruments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NYSE GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WAVE SECURITIES, L.L.C
- Other trademarks owned by ARCHIPELAGO HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Archipelago Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Archipelago Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Archipelago Holdings, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named WAVE SECURITIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |