Drawing for 123 TURNKEY

USPTO serial 76118698

123 TURNKEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROSSMAN, MARY
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 123 TURNKEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID N. SCHACHTER

DAVID N SCHACHTER633 17TH STSTE 3000DENVER, CO 80202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Web hosting services for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Feb 10, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 30, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 2, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 22, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance