USPTO serial 76119396
SUN MOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUN MOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia L. Cotton
PATRICIA L COTTON PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMANLLPINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUPPO BOX 10500MCLEAN, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Fresh garlic, fresh fruits and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |