USPTO serial 76119490
UV-BAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UV-BAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
MICHAEL D FISHMAN39533 WOODWARD AVESTE 140BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | GLASS WINDOWS AND WINDSHIELDS FOR VEHICLES; GLASS WINDOWS AND WINDSHIELDS FOR VEHICLES HAVING COATING FOR CONTROLLING OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GLASS | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | WINDOW AND DOOR GLASS FOR USE IN THE ARCHITECTURAL FIELD; WINDOW AND DOOR GLASS FOR USE IN THE ARCHITECTURAL FIELD, HAVING COATING FOR CONTROLLING OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE GLASS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Guardian Industries Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by Guardian Industries Corp.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named UV-BAN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |