USPTO serial 76119735
REDWAVE NETWORKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDWAVE NETWORKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carla B. Oakley
CARLA B OAKLEY BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWR ONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications equipment, namely, telephone, broadband, wireless, Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM), Internet Protocol (IP) packet switching exchanges, PBX, and key telephone packet switching exchanges; computer hardware, namely, network servers, computer terminals, processors and computer interface boards, pagers, broadband data and video apparatus for teleconferencing; microwave and local multipoint distribution devices that permit the high-speed transmission of simultaneous two-way voice, data and multi-channel video; telecommunications signal routers, electronic switches, hubs, radio transmitters and receivers, microwave and millimeter wave transmitters and receivers, optical transmitters and receivers, transceivers, encoders, decoders, multiplexers, modulators, demodulators, modems, converters, frequency shifters, signal repeaters, signal processors, and antennae; power supplies and battery chargers; telephone sets; electronic alarms for use with transmission devices to signal malfunctions, overloads, or damage; microphones; electronic signal filters; and computer programs for operating telecommunications and data communications systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation and maintenance of wireless broadband network equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Redwave Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Redwave Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named REDWAVE NETWORKS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 25, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |