USPTO serial 76119884
PRO-POWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRO-POWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A. Burge
DAVID A BURGE DAVID A BURGE CO LPAP O BOX 221011CLEVELAND, OH 44122-0992UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | CLEANER FOR REMOVING OIL AND GREASE STAINS, ADHESIVE RESIDUES, GUM, PAINT, TAR AND THE LIKE; CLEANING AND DEGREASING PREPARATION FOR AUTOMOTIVE USE; CLEANING AND CONDITIONING PREPARATION FOR HOT-MELT GLUE GUNS AND OTHER TOOLS; ALL PURPOSE CLEANING PREPARATION; AND LAUNDRY CLEANING PREPARATION, NAMELY, LAUNDRY PREWASH AND STAIN REMOVER | ACTIVE | Sep 29, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |