Drawing for AMPTEK

USPTO serial 76120068

AMPTEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SLOAN, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMPTEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN J. STRAUSS

STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT, LLP6060 CTR DR TENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS, ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS, ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES AND UNINTERRUPTED ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIES FOR ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES, COMPUTERS AND COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; AND POWER MANAGEMENT COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, COMPUTER SOFTWARE USED TO MONITOR THE STATUS AND CONTROL THE PERFORMANCE OF UNINTERRUPTED ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 20, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 28, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 19, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 10, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 28, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance