USPTO serial 76120075
GENIDOC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENIDOC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eva M. Marceau
TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATOR TESTA HURWITZ THIBEAULT LLPHIGH ST TWR125 HIGH ST STE 2200BOSTON, MA 02110-2725Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for secure and confirmed electronic data delivery over networks, including the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 2004 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |