Drawing for PATIENT-CENTRIC

USPTO serial 76120186

PATIENT-CENTRIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PATIENT-CENTRIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morton J. Rosenberg

TRADEMARK DEPT LC 340MEDTRONIC INC710 MEDTRONIC PKWYMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55432-5604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL DEVICES, NAMELY ELECTRONIC PROGRAMMERS COMPRISED OF COMPUTERS, COMPUTER DISPLAYS, AND TELEMETRIC MODULES COMPRISED OF RADIO FREQUENCY TRANSCEIVERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ADJUSTING PRESCRIPTIONS OF PATIENT MEDICAL IMPLANTS, PULSE GENERATORS, RADIO FREQUENCY RECEIVERS, AND A LEAD IMPLANTED IN A PATIENT'S SPINAL CORDS, FOR USE IN THE FIELD OF NEUROSTIMULATIONACTIVE—
042PROVIDING MEDICAL INFORMATION TO OTHERS IN FIELD OF DIAGNOSTIC MEDICINEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 24, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 25, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 20, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 20, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 20, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance