USPTO serial 76120201
THE ITECHNOLOGY OF HEALTHCARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, PAULA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ITECHNOLOGY OF HEALTHCARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bingham B Leverich
BINGHAM B LEVERICH COVINGTON & BURLING1201 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN THE HEALTHCARE FIELD DESIGNED TO TRACK HEALTHCARE COSTS AND INFORMATION AND FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING INSURANCE AND HEALTHCARE FRAUD AND ABUSE | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING FOR OTHERS IN THE HEALTHCARE FIELD RELATING TO THE TRACKING OF HEALTHCARE COSTS AND INFORMATION, AND THE DETECTION AND PREVENTION OF INSURANCE AND HEALTHCARE FRAUD AND ABUSE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE HEALTHCARE FIELD RELATING TO THE TRACKING OF HEALTHCARE COSTS AND INFORMATION, AND THE DETECTION AND PREVENTION OF INSURANCE AND HEALTHCARE FRAUD AND ABUSE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR USE IN THE HEALTHCARE FIELD DESIGNED TO TRACK HEALTHCARE COSTS AND INFORMATION AND FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING INSURANCE AND HEALTHCARE FRAUD AND ABUSE; PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ONLINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE USED IN THE HEALTHCARE FIELD DESIGNED TO TRACK HEALTHCARE COSTS AND INFORMATION AND FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING INSURANCE AND HEALTHCARE FRAUD AND ABUSE; PROVIDING ANALYSIS OF HEALTH INFORMATION FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIPS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIPS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE ITECHNOLOGY OF HEALTHCARE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |