Drawing for VIRTURAD

USPTO serial 76120278

VIRTURAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTURAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott D. Minden,

SCOTT D MINDEN HOWARD RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, ET ALA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION3 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 7SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4065

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management services with respect to departmental management, technologist oversight, outsourcing and consumer/patient online accessACTIVE—
038Computer services, namely, transmitting and providing access to electronic medical images and radiation therapy planning indications over an intranet or InternetACTIVE—
039Storage services for archiving electronic medical images and radiation therapy planning indicationsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting online continuing education programs, seminars, and workshops in the medical fieldACTIVE—
042Provision of diagnostic imaging services; computer services, namely acquiring and processing electronic medical images and radiation therapy planning indications; conducting or arranging research associated with clinical trials in the medical field; providing quality assurance services for others in the medical fieldACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 5, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 10, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 23, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 18, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 29, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 9, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance