USPTO serial 76120444
EAGLES RIDGE NORTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAGLES RIDGE NORTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fountain Hills, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin F. Majestic
MARTIN F MAJESTIC FINNEGAN HENDERSON1300 I ST NW FL 6WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Real estate development services, namely, selling residential real estate lots, expressly excluding leasing and development of shopping center and shopping mall space | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |