USPTO serial 76120612
ENTREPRENEURS FOR ENTREPRENEURS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENTREPRENEURS FOR ENTREPRENEURS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. J. Heher
R J HEHER FENWICK & W LLPTWO PALO ALTO SQSTE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing wireless communications interface that permits otherwise incompatible protocols to communicate with each other; wireless communications services; computer services, namely, customer support and help desk services; computer application provider services; computer services, namely providing computer software applications to others over global computer networks; management of internal and global computer networks; design of computer systems; computer code and system conversion for others; computer consultation; computer diagnostic services; computer programming for commercial and industrial use for others; computer site design; updating of computer software; computer software design for commercial and industrial use for others; consulting services, namely, providing consultation in the field of information, technology, telecommunications, wireless communications and electronic commerce and advising on benefits of using the global computer information network; systems integration services; web integration services; development of custom and package software; software implementation and development services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |